Ultimate Responsibility Lie for the Death of Santiago Nasar Essay Sample free essay sample

â€Å"On the twenty-four hours they were traveling to kill him† [ 1 ] . is the gap to Chronicle of a Death Foretold. by Gabriel Marquez. is a novella written in the signifier of a pseudo-journalistic Reconstruction ; . in which the reader is told about the ‘murder death’ from the first line. Here comes the importance of the subject of duty ; we. along with the storyteller. work backwards to unknot the grounds and the enigmas behind the slaying. However. we must distinguish between two opposite facets of this subject ; duty and action. Some characters were conspicuously conventionally responsible for the decease of Santiago. through their actions. Their actions have lead in a direct or indirect mode. to the latter’s slaying. On the other manus. other characters can be perceived as responsible through their carelessness and laxness. Marquez limpidly vividly depicts the Columbian community. where the novel takes topographic point. as a tightly knit one. in whi ch more than 22 people were either officially or informally informed about the Pablo twins’ purpose. Many of these characters were closely linked to Santiago and have seen him the twenty-four hours he was murdered. such characters include ; Divina Flor. Colonel Aponte and LeonardoLeandro Pornoy. Yet. none of these characters managed to alarm Santiago about his predicted destiny. Furthermore. alongside the ignorance of the different characters. the Colombian codification of honor and civilization can be besides perceived as a responsible figure. The society seemed to see Angela’s misdemeanor. as a more serious event compared to a loss of life. For them. honor is a cardinal moral trait that is critical to maintain integral and its prominence surpasses their hardy spiritual beliefs. Angela Vicario. in malice of non taking the action and killing the supporter. portions beares much initial of the duty for Santiago’s decease. She named him as her deflowerer to her brothers. therefore enforcing on him a decease sentence for his unlawful actions. Yet. it could neer be wholly p roved honestly know if it was truly Santiago who deflowered her. Angela is asked on three separate occasions to call her deflowerer. these three occasions come with a broad span of clip in between. The first juncture. was when she was foremost returned to her house. after Bayardo San Roman learned that she had lost her virginity before their matrimony. The storyteller conveys in colossal item her soundness and decision in calling Santiago. â€Å"she nailed it to the wall with her well-aimed dart. like a butterfly with no will whose sentence has ever been written. ( Marquez. P. 47 ) † As for the 2nd juncture. the storyteller explains that Angela revealed in the tribunal studies. harmonizing to the case’s justice that. â€Å"He ( Santiago ) was my perpetrator† ( Marquez. P. 101 ) . Yet. She does non supply any other inside informations. as to where or when this happened. which reduces her credibleness. Finally the 3rd juncture. comes old ages after the slaying took topographic point. when the storyteller was seeking to unknot the enigmas of the instance. He had already come to a decision that Angela’s naming of Santiago could hold been an effort to salvage her existent lover’s life. The latter was ill-famed of being a ladies’ adult male and accordingly it was easy for people to hold that he is the deflowerer. Furthermore. Santiago was an intimate friend of the Vicario twins and hence. she supposed that they would govern him out from their impression of honor. Yet. when she was asked. she boldly responded. ‘â€Å"He was the 1. ( Marquez. P. 91 ) ’† On both of these three occasions. we get an feeling of her decision and declaration ; she was ever ready to state the name. Divina Flor’s actions played a polar and important function towards the subject of duty. Marquez clearly portrays her fondness and overwhelm towards for Santiago. Yet. the storyteller besides reveals. that she loathed abhorred his sexual maltreatment. She along with her female parent. Victoria Guzman. were notified about the programs to kill Santiago. the forenoon of the incident. However. they both determined. non to advert it to the latter. It could be perceived that she. as a immature adult female. merely stepping into the universe of adolescence. was non yet able define her feelings towards Santiago. The storyteller remarks that. â€Å" ( Divina ) didn’t warn him because she was nil but a scared kid at the clip. incapable of a determination of her ain. † She was ill-defined about her feelings towards him and permitted her female parent to make up ones mind for her. However. Divina’s chief part to the subject of duty arises at the terminal of the novelette. She led Placida Linero. into locking the door. holding believing that she had seen Santiago had gone up to his room. Yet. in fact the latter. was assaulted by the Vicario twins. in forepart of his house and the storyteller remarks that. â€Å" ( he ) merely lacked a few seconds to acquire in when the door closed. ( Marquez. P. 119 ) † Despite. the fact that her semblance sounds implausible. Divina confirms that she had seen him come inside the house. â€Å"It was a really clear vision† ( Marquez. P. 118 ) . We. as the readers are left with no option but to believe her. Two other characters ; LeonardoLeandro Pornoy and Colonel Aponte can be both held responsible for the slaying. they had tantamount opportunities to salvage Santiago’s life. LeonardoLeandro Pornoy. the police officer. was given first manus information. when the Vicario twins. informed him of their purpose to kill Santiago. However. his ignorance prevented him from collaring them or even impounding their knives. In stead. he merely passed the intelligence to Colonel Aponte and dismissed the twins’ history. Similarly. the Colonel. who was informed twice about the slaying. was apathetic and lingering primitive in his actions. The storyteller reveals that. â€Å"He’d settled so many battles between friends the dark before that he was in no haste for another 1. ( Marquez. P. 56 ) † Here the storyteller places great accent on his enunciation. in taking the term. â€Å"friends† . therefore. foregrounding the improbable nature of the Vicario brothers slaying Santiago. The Colonel visited the twins at Clotilde Armenta’s shop and confiscated their knives. He alleged that through impounding the twins’ knives. they will non possess any equipment to perpetrate a slaying. and besides vindicated his action. by depicting them as â€Å"‘a brace of large four-flushers. ( Marquez. P. 56 ) ’† Furthermore. he besides stresses that he can non take farther actions because. ‘â€Å"no one is arrested upon intuition. ( Marquez. P. 57 ) †Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ On the 2nd juncture. Cristo Bedoya. Santiago’s best friend. tells the Colonel. that he has seen the Vicario twins with a new set of knives. The city manager. â€Å"promised to take attention of it at one time. † However. he in fact disregarded the chance of a slaying occurrence. and got distracted by dominoes that dark. During his game. the slaughter slaying was committed. The Colonel should hold comprehended the Vicario twins’ finding to kill Santiago. which has lead them into acquiring a new set of knives. ( and sharpening them ) . after their fir st were confiscated. One might comprehend the Columbian society. its codification of honor and traditions as one of the responsible factors for the murdering of Santiago. The storyteller reveals that at first. the Vicario twins did non desire to acquire involved in the matrimony of their sister. â€Å"it looked to [ them ] like adult female jobs. † However. their perceptual experience of this capable shortly alterations. once they find out that their sister is has been returned because she had lost her virginity. They become obliged to support their sister’s regard and to obey by the Columbian codification of honor. The restoring of her self-respect. hence becomes a jutting necessity action for them to do and they are told that. ‘â€Å"Honor doesn’t delay. ( Marquez. P. 63 ) † Yet. the storyteller divulges that they were compelled to perpetrate the slaying. It was a responsibility that they had to carry through. in order to run into the society’s outlooks. Many ch aracters ; including Clotilde Armenta touched mentioned this irresistible impulse. she even reveals that. ‘â€Å"It’s to save those hapless male childs from the atrocious responsibility that’s fallen on them ( Marquez. P. 57 ) †Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ Throughout this novelette. many characters ( including the Columbian society itself ) . could be beheld responsible through their actions. for the slaying of Santiago. Yet. one might feel that it is the Columbian codification of honor that obviously stands out as the reliable killer. Its antique political orientation and finding of facts on the instance of Angela Vicario was what has lead to Santiago’s slaying. The Vicario twins were persuaded into assassinating their friend. in order to recover their sister’s lost pride. We could neer genuinely know if it was Santiago who deflowered Angela. yet he was still murdered in strong belief that he was the wrongdoer. The storyteller divulges that. â€Å"Nevertheless. what has alarmed him ( the justice ) most at the decision of his inordinate diligence was non holding found a individual hint. non even the most unlikely that Santiago had been the cause of the incorrect. ( Marquez. P. 100 ) † This is in malice of the abund ant grounds collected in footings of the probes. interviews. studies and aggregation of facts. Marquez. delectations as a author. in non offering the reader what he wants to cognize. We are told about the slaying from the first lines of the book but are left to judge whether Santiago was the deflowerer or non. Plants Cited: †¢ â€Å"Chronicle of a Death Foretold. † – College Essay. Web. 20 Sept. 2012.hypertext transfer protocol: //www. oppapers. com/essays/Chronicle-Of-A-Death-Foretold/227209 †¢ â€Å"Chronicles of a Death Foretold. † English11IB-Dineen. Web. 20 Sept. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //english11ib-dineen. commack. wikispaces. net/CDF Chapter 5 †¢ â€Å"Chronicle of a Death Foretold. † SparkNotes. SparkNotes. Web. 3 Mar. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. sparknotes. com/lit/chrondeath/canalysis. hypertext markup language †¢ â€Å"Who or What Was Responsible for the Death of Santiago Nasar Essay. † Who or What Was Responsible for the Death of Santiago Nasar Essay. Web. 4 Mar. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. exampleessays. com/viewpaper/15622. hypertext markup language †¢ â€Å"Search Study Guides! Include Chapter Summaries A ; Analysis. † Novelguide. . Web. 3 Mar. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. novelguide. com/Chronicle-of-a-Death-Foretold/essayquestions. hypertext markup language †¢ â€Å"Chronicles of a Death Foretold. Web. 19 Sept. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. coursework. info/GCSE/English_Literature/Prose_Fiction/Miscellaneous/Santiago_Nasar_s_Death_in_______Chronicl_L864986. hypertext markup language †¢ â€Å"Chronicles of a Death Foretold. Web. 19 Sept. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. coursework. info/International_Baccalaureate/World_Literature/Creative_Responses/Chronicle_of_a_Death_Foretold_Commentari_L905999. hypertext markup language [ 1 ] Marquez. Gabriel G. Chronicle of a Death Foretold. : Penguin Books. 2007. Print.